The St. Louis Cardinals are entering a period of transition that feels unfamiliar for one of baseball’s most consistently competitive franchises. For decades, St. Louis fans have been accustomed to contending teams, meaningful September baseball, and a front office that rarely tolerated extended downturns. Now, however, the organization finds itself in the midst of a clear rebuild, and expectations for the upcoming season are arguably as modest as they have been in years.
Around the league, there is little optimism that the Cardinals will challenge for a postseason spot in the immediate future. Most projections place them near the bottom of the National League Central, grouped with teams that are either rebuilding or still searching for an identity. The Pittsburgh Pirates, long a divisional afterthought, appear to be trending upward after making tangible roster improvements, while St. Louis has taken the opposite path by parting with veterans and reshaping its long-term outlook. As a result, it would not be surprising to see the Pirates finish ahead of the Cardinals in the standings—something that would have been unthinkable not long ago.
Still, a rebuilding season does not automatically equate to a wasted year. In many ways, the upcoming campaign may prove more meaningful for the Cardinals’ future than some of their recent attempts to contend. Rebuilds are defined less by wins and losses and more by development, evaluation, and discovery. For St. Louis, this season represents a crucial proving ground for a wide range of young players and prospects who are fighting to establish themselves at the major league level. Among those players, one name in particular is beginning to draw attention as a potential breakout candidate: outfielder Nathan Church.
Church has quietly worked his way through the Cardinals’ minor league system, initially carving out a reputation as a defense-first player. For much of his professional career, evaluators viewed him as a reliable glove with limited offensive upside—a player who could help an organization in depth roles but might struggle to carve out a long-term starting job in the majors. That perception began to shift dramatically during the 2025 season.
Across stints in Double-A and Triple-A, Church delivered the most impressive offensive performance of his career. He posted a weighted runs created plus (wRC+) of 144, a mark that signals production well above league average. This was not a marginal improvement or a small-sample fluke; it was a sustained, across-the-board step forward that forced scouts and analysts to reconsider his ceiling. Prior to this surge, Church was often categorized as organizational depth—someone who could fill in during injuries or serve as a fifth outfielder. After his 2025 performance, that label no longer feels adequate.
One of the most encouraging indicators from Church’s breakout season was his ability to make consistent contact. At the Triple-A level, he recorded a Z-Contact percentage of 94.9, an elite figure that underscores how rarely he swings and misses at pitches in the strike zone. This skill becomes especially important when evaluating hitters who do not rely heavily on power. Church is not known for launching towering home runs or driving the ball out of the park with regularity. Instead, his offensive value depends on his bat-to-ball skills, pitch recognition, and ability to keep the ball in play.
For hitters like Church, contact quality and consistency are essential. Without significant raw power to fall back on, prolonged slumps can quickly jeopardize playing time. However, his 2025 numbers suggest that he has developed the offensive foundation necessary to survive—and possibly thrive—at the highest level. While he may never profile as a middle-of-the-order bat, he has shown signs of becoming a dependable contributor who can reach base, extend at-bats, and apply pressure with speed.
Defensively, Church has long been ahead of the curve. His glove has been his calling card since the early stages of his professional career, and it remains a major reason why he is expected to be part of the Cardinals’ plans moving forward. He combines solid athleticism with good instincts, allowing him to cover ground efficiently in the outfield. His reads off the bat are clean, and his routes are generally crisp, traits that managers and pitching staffs value highly.
In addition to his defensive reliability, Church brings speed to the roster. While he may not be a game-breaking burner, his quickness enhances both his range in the field and his utility on the bases. He is capable of taking the extra base, applying pressure on opposing defenses, and contributing in situational roles such as pinch running or late-inning defensive substitutions. These skills alone give him a strong case for a spot on the Opening Day roster, particularly for a team that is prioritizing development over veteran stability.
The true question surrounding Church, however, is not whether he belongs on the roster, but how significant his role could become. Early projections suggest he will begin the season as the Cardinals’ fourth outfielder, a role that would still offer meaningful playing time given injuries, rest days, and matchup considerations. Yet there is a growing belief that Church could push his way into a starting job if circumstances align in his favor.
Competition in the Cardinals’ outfield remains fluid, and performance will likely dictate opportunities more than pedigree. If an established starter struggles offensively or fails to maintain consistency, the door could open for Church to claim a more prominent role. In particular, some observers believe he could challenge Victor Scott II for a regular spot in the lineup should Scott experience extended offensive difficulties. In a rebuilding environment, the Cardinals are far more likely to reward production than patience, especially when evaluating players who could factor into their long-term plans.
Church’s brief exposure to the major leagues did not mirror his minor league success, but that is hardly unusual. The jump from Triple-A to MLB is significant, and many players require time to adjust to elite pitching, sharper defensive alignments, and the daily grind of a major league season. Importantly, Church’s struggles at the top level have not erased the progress he made in the minors. Instead, they provide a baseline from which improvement can be measured.
What makes the current situation especially favorable for Church is the broader context of the Cardinals’ rebuild. On a contending team with veteran depth and postseason aspirations, a player like Church might find himself stuck in a limited role or shuttling between the majors and minors. In St. Louis’ current state, opportunities are more abundant. The organization needs to learn what it has, and that means giving players extended chances to succeed—or fail—against major league competition.
Spring training will be particularly important for Church. With roster spots and roles still up for grabs, strong performance in camp could significantly alter the team’s plans. Coaches will be watching closely not just for results, but for process: quality of at-bats, defensive consistency, situational awareness, and adaptability. Church’s well-rounded skill set positions him well to make a strong impression.
From a broader perspective, players like Church symbolize what this rebuild could eventually produce. Not every breakout prospect will become a star, but sustainable success often comes from assembling a roster filled with competent, versatile contributors who complement one another. If Church can establish himself as a reliable everyday outfielder—or even a high-end role player—he would represent a meaningful developmental win for the organization.
In many ways, the upcoming season will be less about the standings and more about answers. Can Nathan Church translate his minor league breakout into consistent major league production? Can his bat support his already-strong defensive profile? And can he emerge as a core piece of the Cardinals’ next competitive window?
The Cardinals may not win many games this year, but for players like Church, the stakes are high. Opportunity, timing, and preparation are converging, and the path to a larger role has never been clearer. If his recent progress is any indication, Nathan Church is poised to make the most of it—and in doing so, he could become one of the more intriguing success stories to emerge from St. Louis’ rebuilding era.
READ MORE
End of an Era: Cardinals Say Goodbye to Fan Favorite After Blockbuster
BREAKING: Cardinals Fan favourite signs with Mariners shortly after release
BREAKING: Mariners finalize trade for St. Louis Cardinals All-Star infielder
